The post In Session: Danny Harris appeared first on Aspen Institute.

Recent and rapid policy shifts within the federally-funded research and higher education ecosystems have raised fundamental questions about our nation’s social contract for science, originally articulated in 1945 through Vannevar Bush’s groundbreaking Endless Frontier report. This changing landscape poses new challenges and opportunities throughout the broader science, engineering, technology, and mathematics (STEM) communities. Our ability to meet the moment will determine the long-term health of the nation’s STEM endeavor, as well as the critical innovations it produces for health, prosperity, and national security.

America’s rising generations—the youth and young adults best positioned to meet the country’s growing need for STEM professionals—are on the front lines of this transition. Attracting and supporting their training and development at a time when uncertainty is high and alternative pathways abound will require significant and sustained coordination across STEM sectors. Whether situated in formal and informal learning institutions, industry, government, or civil society, we must all come together to support, reform, and enhance our collective investment in the future leaders of STEM.

This report, developed as part of the Aspen Institute Science & Society Program’s 2025 roundtable series, synthesizes insights from practitioners in K–12 education, higher education, science research, professional associations, science communication, and civic science. The project builds on Science & Society’s long-standing informal science education work, including the award-winning Our Future Is Science (OFIS) youth initiative.

Over the course of multiple consultations, participants explored how to strengthen the nation’s STEM learning continuum, from early exposure to advanced careers. The convenings focused on generating strategies around four core objectives related to rising generations:

1. Attracting a wide group of youth and young adults to STEM while deepening engagement among those demonstrating existing interest in STEM;
2. Achieving learning goals that reflect shifting ideas about STEM education from K–12 through early career;
3. Aligning research and technical training with the wide range of jobs and careers that scientists and those in allied fields ultimately pursue, including middle-skilled jobs, industry research, and foundational research paths; and 
4. Strengthening proven collaborations while drawing on untapped opportunities for partnership. 

The STEM ecosystem in the U.S. is highly complex, with only loose connections at best across institutions. For example, K–12 education systems and youth-oriented informal STEM learning programs within the same community often have little to no direct contact with one another. Instead, individual science teachers are left to serve as connectors, working to the best of their abilities to help students find programs that support their growth. These specific linkages are critical but insufficient to fully realize the joint potential of formal and informal organizations in engaging youth in STEM.

Similarly, higher education institutions, from community colleges to research universities, are driven to help their graduates develop meaningful and marketable job skills. Yet, despite scattered success stories from regional cooperatives around the nation, the dominant experience is one of missed opportunities. Always, but particularly as AI accelerates shifts in workplace needs, there is demand for higher education to coordinate with industry leaders and adapt curricula in responsive ways.

Partnerships require time and resources, often hinging on dedicated individual and organizational “connectors” who help sustain partnerships and keep coalitions moving toward shared goals. Though educational institutions are being squeezed to do more with less, participants noted that the payoff from investing in connective tissue is wide-reaching, helping communities, schools, and industries co-design pathways that reflect both local priorities and national needs.

Across every roundtable, participants identified partnerships and collaborations as both the greatest opportunity and the most persistent challenge in STEM education and workforce development. At the same time, they noted the siloed nature of the STEM community, where opportunities to meet across sectors are all too rare and often too short-term to fully support rising generations in STEM.

Participants emphasized that no single institution or sector can meet the nation’s STEM goals or achieve systemic change on its own. Fully realizing the country’s potential for rising generations in STEM will require durable networks that bridge education, research, workforce, and community spheres. This report offers a roadmap, organized around three fundamental goals: 

1. Attracting and Engaging Youth and Young Adults Through Relevant STEM 
2. Supporting a Wide Mix of Job and Career Pathways in STEM
3. Meeting the Shifting Needs for Skill Development in STEM

Taken together, the recommendations presented in this report call for a new type of “social contract” for STEM—one grounded in shared purpose and shared responsibility towards all who aspire to participate.

This work is supported by the Moore Foundation.

The post Realizing the Potential of the Science Community to Support Rising Generations in STEM appeared first on Aspen Institute.

Catalina’s impact is undeniable and includes the decriminalization of abortion in Colombia, securing the freedom of women unjustly imprisoned for abortion-related matters in El Salvador, litigating the landmark 2020 case of Paola Guzmán Albarracín before the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, which, for the first time, recognized the right to comprehensive sexual education for girls and adolescents at the regional level, and being one of the leaders of the Niñas No Madres movement in Latin America.

Catalina is an Aspen Institute Colombia Fellow in the third cohort. We talked to her at the 2025 Resnick Aspen Action Forum to learn more about her leadership journey and the crucial work ahead to ensure that every woman across the region has the autonomy to choose her own destiny.

Answers have been lightly edited for length and clarity.

What’s the problem you’re committed to solving, and what actions are you taking to make progress?

The problem I am committed to solving is gender equality. I fight so that every woman has the right to make important decisions in their life and has control over her future and her projects. When women have access to these services, they are empowered to act in a better way in society and in the political arena. 

The actions I am taking to achieve gender equality are working in a community with diverse stakeholders, including non-traditional allies, to create collective action. To be able to resolve these issues, we need lots of different people at the table with us. 

The other thing I try to do is lead with creativity and innovation, thinking outside the box to use various pedagogical and communication strategies to educate the public on this pressing matter in our society. And I think that being able to do this work with creativity, passion, and a sense of mission will make it more powerful. 

I have the privilege of working on something that I really believe in. I think that the political is personal, and the personal is political. When I go to work, I am working on my political agenda as well because I truly believe that women need to have an equal place in society to men. This is my political bet. And this is my personal value and purpose.

Tell us about your leadership journey and any lessons you’ve learned along the way.

I am a feminist activist, and I have been working for sexual and reproductive rights for almost 15 years now. It has been a very beautiful path because we are fighting for equality and for women’s rights across the region. I’ve learned that in order to learn how to be a leader — and how to be a better leader — we also need to look inside and work on ourselves and our understanding of our fears, our purpose, and the sense of mission that we have. 

Once you do the work internally, you are better equipped to work in a community and to work for a purpose. 

The second lesson, I think, is the collective action in this work. When you are working toward social change and social justice, you need to understand that you must put together a community and bring collective action to make real, impactful changes. 

If you were to write a letter to your younger self, what piece of advice or what words of wisdom would you share with her?

I would tell my little self to believe in herself and to be true to her values and beliefs. We can be as creative and as innovative as we want, and that is what is going to make us original and successful. 

What do you wish more people knew about leadership?

A lot of people wait until they get a title or they get a rank. Leadership is a personal conviction that this thing makes me angry, and I’m going to do something about it. If more people understood that, they would realize the power that they can make change in their communities.

If you could write a letter to your younger self, what would it be?

You are enough is what the letter would say. It’s not about the schools you go to or the company you keep — it’s about what you carry in you. I’m a very deeply spiritual person, and I realized that later in life. So I think I would tell myself to seek God earlier. It would have given me more confidence to know who I am, what I carry and who I belong to.

About the Aspen Global Leadership Network

The Aspen Global Leadership Network (AGLN) is a dynamic, worldwide community of nearly 4,000 entrepreneurial leaders from over 60 countries. Spanning business, government, and the nonprofit sector, these leaders share a commitment to enlightened leadership and the drive to tackle the most pressing challenges of our times. Through transformative Fellowship programs and  gatherings like the Resnick Aspen Action Forum, AGLN Fellows have the unique opportunity to connect, collaborate, and challenge each other to grow and commit to a lifelong journey of impact.

More from 2025 Resnick Aspen Action Forum

In July 2025, over 500 leaders across the Aspen Global Leadership Network (AGLN) community gathered for our largest Action Forum to date. Joined by nearly 100 young leaders, AGLN Fellows from more than 30 countries returned to the enduring questions first posed at at the founding of the Aspen Institute 75 years go: What does it mean to lead with purpose in times of profound uncertainty?

Explore more inspiring content on leadership and change-making from the 2025 Action Forum here.

The post Leading with Purpose: Why Bodily Autonomy is the Ultimate Act of Freedom appeared first on Aspen Institute.

John Peabody

Director of Content Strategy

It turns out you can learn a lot in five minutes.

Over the past year, close to every week we have published a new In Session video from the Aspen Institute, a short focused conversation featuring practical wisdom from across the Institute’s global community. Every episode goes up on YouTube, with shorter cutdowns for LinkedIn and Instagram.

I had the privilege of being in the room for every interview. That meant sitting across from leaders and builders at the top of their fields and asking them to talk honestly about the moments that shaped them. Some of the videos I come back to regularly include:

• Simon Godwin, the artistic director of the Shakespeare Theatre Company and the 2023/24 Harman Eisner Artist in Residence for the Aspen Institute Arts Program, making the case for being more spontaneous. “For a long time I thought the role of a leader was to be a serious, thoughtful, rather sober figure,” he says. “But as I have directed more and more plays, worked with more and more extraordinary actors, I have realized the opposite is true. Actually, my job is to bring playfulness every day into the spaces that I lead.”
• Andy Cunningham, the Aspen Institute trustee and Silicon Valley marketing and communications leader, laying out how culture drives behavior and how the best leaders give people the freedom to execute. “You have to give people the freedom to execute things the way that they think they should be executed and not micromanage them,” she says. “You cannot get a bunch of people to do things for you if you are micromanaging them. So you give them the goal, you set the expectation, and then you let them do it.”
• Alex Azar, former United States Secretary of Health and Human Services and Aspen Institute board trustee, sharing the critical lessons he learned while overseeing Operation Warp Speed, an ambitious collaboration between the federal government and the private sector that aimed to accelerate the development of a COVID vaccine. According to him, “A team gains confidence by knowing that you have delegated to them, that they have the authority to make decisions, to drive forward, to not look over their shoulders all the time.”
• Carly Zakin, the cofounder and co CEO of theSkimm and Henry Crown Fellow, sharing advice for entrepreneurs, including embracing the unknown, building a support network, and refreshing it constantly. “There is a reason people say it can feel lonely at the top,” she says. “It often does. But that does not mean you have to be alone. It is essential to build a network of trusted personal advisors, your own board that you can turn to and say, ‘I need help,’ or ‘I am not sure what to do,’ or simply, ‘Can I talk this through with you?’ The key is recognizing that this circle of advisors should evolve as you grow.”
• Dar Vanderbeck, vice president of the Aspen Global Leadership Network, on the importance of being first in the water. “There is some inherent value to putting up your hand and going first, and going first not just out of bravado but by being able to acknowledge that this is scary and still we are going to learn together,” Dar says. “So let us get going. I think that is such an important idea for people in the beginning of their leadership journeys.”
• Yuliya Tychkivska, executive director of Aspen Institute Kyiv, reflecting on lessons she has learned during her life and from the war in Ukraine. “Leadership is really different from management,” says Yuliya. “It is not just about managing people and making things happen. It is about caring about your people. It is about inspiring. It is about giving hope to your team and leading this community of people who are part of your community.”
• Corby Kummer, executive director of Food and Society at the Aspen Institute, reflecting on ingredients of successful leadership like turning self doubt into strength and using dialogue as an essential tool. “Everybody has doubts about kind of everything they do, but you have got to keep going,” he says. “It is that simple. Even if something fails once, fails twice, fails three times, you keep going with it.”

But those are just a few of so many.

The In Session videos span business, policy, economic mobility, the arts, academia, social impact, and more. What stood out most for me was not the range of sectors but the common threads of Aspen leaders: integrity, purpose, resilience, curiosity, and the courage to take smart risks.

As a content creator, producing In Session has been a dream project. It has also been a welcome crash course in leadership. These are real stories and real lessons distilled into something you can take with you in under five minutes

More than anything, this series has shown me how deep insight and experience runs within the Aspen Institute network, far beyond what you see on a stage or in a website bio.

In Session lives on our site, and you can also watch on YouTube, Instagram, and LinkedIn. I hope these conversations serve as a helpful companion in your journey, something you can return to when you need perspective, encouragement, or one good idea to move forward.

The post In Session Reflections appeared first on Aspen Institute.

The Aspen Institute Financial Security Program (Aspen FSP) believes that we can better address this omnipresent challenge by centering peoples’ lived experiences in our assessment of whether the programs, policies, and products in the public and private marketplace are addressing the scale of the problem and what is needed to develop, deploy, or advance practical solutions. One way Aspen FSP has adopted this person-centered approach is through our Community Advisory Group (CAG). Composed of nine leaders with direct and professional expertise in financial insecurity, the group provides deep, ongoing feedback into our work.

During our 2025 CAG in-person convening, Aspen FSP hosted a workshop aimed at identifying the financial shocks that are most pertinent to their lives. To accomplish this, CAG members were presented with a range of financial shocks and asked to vote for the shocks they found most stressful and most challenging to resolve in their own lives. The bubble charts below demonstrate the results of this activity:

Hardest to Resolve

Most Stressful

Bubble charts designed by Grace Castelin with Flourish.

The financial shocks that rose to the top—during the voting activity and our discussion—were funeral costs and health-related shocks such as medical expenses, managing one’s mental health, and having a child. CAG members noted that these shocks can cause both emotional and physical distress, making them particularly difficult to navigate. They stated that even when they paid into resources intended to help manage financial shocks, such as health insurance and life insurance, those resources rarely cover these expenses in full. One CAG member said, “The safeguards you thought you had in place often aren’t there.” Moreover, accessing these various forms of insurance can be a cumbersome, time-consuming process, and finding the right information is not always straightforward. 

To cope with these financial shocks, CAG members said they have turned to a combination of resources like credit cards, payment plans, mutual aid, and grants, noting that these often have to be pieced together in order to be sufficient. One CAG member recounted her experience maxing out credit cards to cover funeral expenses for family members: “I sacrificed for years to build up a good credit score just to watch it wiped out in an instant. I maxed out multiple credit cards to pay for the funeral of a family member, as devastating as this is, I am still blessed that I had good credit to even be able to do that. It has pushed me back to ground zero, but it’s what I had to do at the moment.”

This workshop with CAG members also demonstrated the human toll of financial shocks and the disconnect between the landscape of financial products and services and the people they should reach. As people face the sticker shock that often accompanies a medical bill or funeral expense, they also experience the cognitive overload of navigating an evolving product landscape. For example, in the absence of adequate insurance or emergency savings, should someone try to negotiate a payment plan with the hospital, open a new line of credit, or borrow from retirement savings? One CAG member stated “[there are] chains of shocks, the important thing to understand is which one affects [the] others, the connection between them.” Determining the best course of action for a particular individual or household based on their circumstances is challenging enough on a good day; adding time constraints, insufficient information, and emotional, physical, or mental health-related impacts can compound to wipe out built-up financial health.

“Without the proper safeguards to keep them afloat, people may find themselves stuck in a vicious cycle that leaves them less and less equipped to handle the next financial shock.”

To meaningfully help people overcome an unexpected expense or series of expenses, financial solutions must be responsive to people’s lived realities and needs. Financial institutions and other key stakeholders can accomplish this by implementing human-centered design principles in the development of their own products, conducting research that centers the experience of real people, or building advisory groups for ongoing feedback on operations. 

Aspen FSP is committed to building upon these initial findings and will be continuing its work on financial shocks throughout the next year. We will:

• Produce an updated understanding of financial shocks, identifying the typology, frequency, and severity of shocks that influence how people are able to cope with and prepare for a shock;
• Identify opportunities to expand or scale existing products that are working well, modify existing products that could be working better, and consider market gaps that new tools could fill; and 
• Investigate the role of institutions, markets, and policy, identifying how our financial system delivers on financial resilience for U.S. households and how we can improve on these systems. 

Aspen FSP aims to translate these person-centered insights into actionable, systemic solutions that help people recover from a financial shock and equip them to thrive in the long-term. 

Related

Blog Posts

Safeguarding Financial Security in the Face of Severe Weather: The Role of Financial Institutions

UnfavoriteFavoriteNovember 19, 2025

• Sheida Isabel Elmi

Blog Posts

A Persistent Challenge: How Financial Shocks Continue to Undermine Family Financial Security

Most households experience at least one financial shock in a given year, but there are few comprehensive solutions to help them. How can we solve this persistent challenge?

UnfavoriteFavoriteOctober 30, 2025

• Sheida Isabel Elmi

Blog Posts

Beyond Income: Worker Financial Security and the Role of Benefits Inside and Outside of the Workplace

U.S. workers need access to both public and workplace benefits, but often the connections between these benefits are fractured.

UnfavoriteFavoriteOctober 9, 2025

• Sheida Isabel Elmi

Blog Posts

Aspen FSP Welcomes Three New Members to Its Community Advisory Group

Aspen FSP welcomes three young adult leaders to our Community Advisory Group.

UnfavoriteFavoriteSeptember 10, 2025

Publications

Five Forces of Change Shaping the Next Decade of Inclusive Finance

What will the U.S. financial system look like in 10 years? To find out, read our report on the first Aspen Leadership Forum on Inclusive Finance.

UnfavoriteFavoriteJuly 23, 2025

• Erin Borġ (Thiemann)
• Kate Griffin
• Mack Wallace

Publications

Surviving the Storms: How Severe Weather Hazards Challenge the Financial Security of Small Businesses

Severe weather hazards are an increasing threat for small businesses. This report offers a framework to understand the challenges faced by small businesses, as well as opportunities to support their recovery.

UnfavoriteFavoriteJuly 17, 2025

• Bianca Sofia Lopez
• Shehryar Nabi
• Steven Brown

Publications

Learning from Young Adults to Improve Public Benefits for All

Nearly one in five young adults experience poverty. Public benefits can help them afford daily life as they establish themselves.

UnfavoriteFavoriteMay 13, 2025

• Bianca Sofia Lopez
• Sheida Isabel Elmi

Video

From Challenges to Change: Young Voices on Financial Equity

Olivia Farmer and Joanna Smith-Ramani explore the challenges young adults face in achieving financial stability at the Aspen Ideas Festival.

UnfavoriteFavoriteJanuary 4, 2025

Publications

What Expanding Native American Representation in the Legal Field Can Teach Us About Building a More Diverse Financial Services Industry

This case study takes lessons from the legal field’s efforts to empower Native youth to learn how we can build a financial sector that better serves diverse communities.

UnfavoriteFavoriteJuly 15, 2024

Publications

Beyond Bootstraps: Lifting Up Young Women’s Voices About How to Build an Economy That Works for Them

Beyond Bootstraps highlights how to build an economy that works for young women (ages 15-24).

UnfavoriteFavoriteApril 29, 2024

• Céline Apollon
• Heather McCulloch

The post Why Current Solutions Fail Our Most Painful Financial Shocks: Insights from our Community Advisory Group appeared first on Aspen Institute.

When the COVID-19 pandemic swept across the United States in 2020, former U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services and Aspen Institute Board Trustee Alex Azar faced the challenge of a lifetime: how to expedite the development, testing, approval, and distribution of a coronavirus vaccine.

He oversaw Operation Warp Speed, an ambitious collaboration between the federal government and the private sector that aimed to accelerate the development of a COVID-19 vaccine and deliver millions of doses of the vaccine by January 2021. In this episode of In Session, Azar shares the leadership lessons he learned from the experience, framed around three key principles: alignment, execution, and resilience.

This video is a part of our new series In Session, where we ask leaders from across the Aspen Institute network to reflect on their own leadership journeys and offer practical wisdom gained from their experiences. Stay tuned for more episodes, and subscribe to our leadership newsletter to make sure you don’t miss a thing.

Explore more leadership content on our In Focus: Igniting Leadership page.

The post In Session: Alex Azar appeared first on Aspen Institute.

Whether fighting fires or working to connect people to critical governmental services, Mike’s work has followed a simple philosophy: government in service of its people. Now, Mike serves as an Aspen FSP Fellow within our Benefits Transformation Initiative portfolio. We sat down with Mike to learn more about his model of leadership, his experience in state and federal benefits administration, and the ways he is supporting current state benefit leaders through the Aspen Institute State Benefits Leadership Cohort.

Tell us about yourself. What drew you to a career in state government? 

Fortunately, I had an opportunity to join state service immediately after grad school. Little did I know that it was exactly what I was looking for and that I had the heart of a public servant. I started at the California Department of Finance where the governor’s largest policy statement—the budget—is developed each year. My master’s degree is in political science, and finance is where the executive, legislative, and sometimes judicial branches all come together, along with external stakeholders and the press. What interested me about political science was inter-branch relationships, so it fit perfectly with what I liked about the field.

I worked in the Department of Finance for 13 years because I found that I could see all of state government from that one place. I could work within Health and Human Services (HHS), local government, education, and employee retirement and compensation issues. So I could bounce around, take those skill sets, and move to a different issue area, where I could apply what I learned to new policy and with new colleagues.

You have led both state and federal level efforts to improve benefits delivery, for both clients and administrative staff. To achieve that, much of your focus has been on the role of new technology. How did you come to focus on that intersection?

When I became undersecretary at California’s HHS, IT came under my supervision, and I decided, if I’m going to do this, then I’m going to do it differently. We were in the Great Recession at the time, and HHS was facing serious reductions across benefits programs. While working under limited resources certainly provides its challenges, I have found that if you’re creative it can also focus government on the issues that matter most in connecting people with benefits.

The secretary at the time had asked me, “What’s the cumulative impact here? How many families are we hitting two, three, four, or five times with these reductions?” The data systems weren’t set up that way, so I couldn’t actually answer that question. I put the people we serve at the forefront of what we do and, in doing so, realized that the systems in place were a barrier to achieving that aim. I knew action was needed to make big changes.

Around that time, I was introduced to Code for America, and they introduced me to agile and modular approaches. We were also getting into open data, so we created an innovation office and did data use agreements across the 12 departments so that we could start to figure out issues and see overlap across departments. That was fundamental: If you’re going to focus on the impact you have on people, that needs to be the focus of your data.

From California HHS, you went on to the Governor’s Office, and then moved to the federal government working with HHS and the Office of Management and Budget. There, you helped coalesce senior leaders at eight different federal agencies around a set of North Stars for the delivery of public benefits. Tell us more about that work.

We were taking much-needed steps to change the relationship between government and people, particularly through how services were delivered. Government cannot do it alone. In my experience, the biggest, most impactful changes are done through public-private partnerships. That means harnessing the expertise of vendors, philanthropic partnerships, academia, and the whole of government. It was a whole effort.

The goal of the North Stars was to help agencies align their efforts with the needs of the people they serve. I have had the good fortune to work with people who truly care about the people we strive to serve. That sense of service, whether you work for government, the private sector, or philanthropic organizations, can inspire a group to make big change. And believe me, you need inspiration, because much of the real work is a slog. You have to be relentless in your commitment. You need endurance for the long haul.

My advice: Never lose sight of the individual. Value people’s time and ensure your policies and programs have empathy for the lives that people lead. You’re meeting them where they are. What is it that they need in their lives? You build around that. And you should always think back to the impact the process of getting the benefit has on them, both positive and negative.

As an Aspen FSP Fellow, you have helped develop the Aspen Institute State Benefits Leadership Cohort. How did the Cohort come to be? 

The Cohort really came out of a conversation that Tim [Shaw, director of the Benefits Transformation Initiative] and I had about the North Stars after we had gotten the sign-off from eight federal agencies. Tim asked, “So you got it signed, now what’s next?” The North Stars, by their nature, are vision statements. They’re just goals. The federal government wasn’t going to mandate them, and implementation is at the state and local level.

Tim and I talked about my service as Secretary of Health and Human Services for the State of California. In that role, you lead the shaping of health and human services policies that will touch 40 million lives. It is not just a job; there is a heft to it. It’s a responsibility, and it can be lonely. Setting the table for people in similar roles across the nation to converse and share ideas struck me as a noble effort.

In talking to Tim, we asked ourselves, “How do we bring thought leaders across states together?” We came up with the idea of creating the Cohort—a space where we can build relationships between state leaders, giving them a space to talk not only about the successes but the failures. The challenge with being a leader in government is that you don’t always have the opportunity to acknowledge that you didn’t get it right the first time and that there may be opportunities for improvement. There can be political sensitivities in doing so. This Cohort allows the space to have these conversations and to learn from each other. These are complex systems and if you do this work at these levels, you really are part of an exclusive club in this country. You need allies. You need to learn from each other to really accomplish big things.

“Setting the table for people in similar roles across the nation to converse and share ideas struck me as a noble effort.”

This space—this Cohort—is for leaders to organically share ideas, experiences, and insights. It’s a safe space where no one’s going to run out and put this in the press. You can talk about times when things didn’t work the way you intended, what you learned from it, and how it led to your next success. When I was Secretary, I was fine with making mistakes—everyone makes mistakes—but I’d much rather make new ones. I don’t want to make your mistake. You already made the mistake, so tell me what it was so I can learn from that, and as a group, we can move forward. My hope is that in sharing our experiences it streamlines our collective path.

The Cohort offers a space not just for information sharing and problem solving but for reflection. Why is it important for state benefits leaders to have a space for reflection?

Setting the table for true partnership is in my view one of the greatest benefits of the Cohort. Having a space for self-reflection allows us to think about ourselves as leaders and our strategic vision. If you’re anything like me, self-reflection is critical to understanding the “why” behind our actions and strategies. It’s about having the partners to really help you think through and know that you’re not alone in this, that other leaders are struggling with the same things. In all likelihood, the leaders before us struggled with some of the same challenges. How do we break that cycle? Before you know it, we will be handing off this responsibility to the next generation of leaders. Let’s hope that our efforts pave the way, and while they’ll certainly have challenges, let’s hope that they’re not the same challenges.

“These are complex systems and if you do this work at these levels, you really are part of an exclusive club in this country. You need allies. You need to learn from each other to really accomplish big things.”

Leadership positions are tough. If you’re not purposeful, your day can just be all tactical. Actually finding the time, the space, and the right headspace to really think strategically about what you want for this organization and the people of this state is key. What are you trying to do as a leader?

How have the North Stars and the Cohort changed the way states deliver benefits?

It’s exciting to see how states are modernizing their relationships with the public. We’re seeing technology solutions that go far beyond what I certainly would have imagined when I entered the workforce. More and more we see digital service shops established as a core function of the benefit services programs across the nation. The question now is: How do you scale? And how do you actually change the way the government does its business? How do you change how it interacts with people?

Policy leaders are increasingly recognizing the vital role technology plays in providing benefits to people and simplifying the work of caseworkers. The emergence of AI has heightened this awareness and the criticality of addressing technology’s role. Capacity alone is not sufficient. You have to have somebody who recognizes that not investing in technology is a problem. So, you need risk-takers. You can mitigate some of that risk by showing that this is possible and that it’s being done in other places. That’s part of what the Cohort does—it helps to pool the risk. You diminish the risk by saying that you’re either doing it with partners or you’re following in the footsteps of something that’s been done before. 

There’s also an inspirational aspect of showing people what another state is doing. Through this model, Cohort members can talk about delivery and technology, how to build capacity, and how to forge partnerships with third parties. I really am a firm believer that you have to develop an ecosystem. There really has to be that blending of the public and private sectors. But somebody in the public sector needs to lead that. It has to be around a purpose, and that purpose should be defined by the public sector.

What are you most looking forward to doing as an Aspen FSP Fellow? What are your hopes for the Cohort going forward?

Most of us are here because we want to be in service to others. We have dedicated our lives to public service, and I think that is a noble pursuit. Doing good for other people. It’s that simple. As for me, when I left my government positions, I worried that I would lose that sense of service, and my work would have less meaning. Not the case. The work we do in this Cohort—bringing together others with that same sense of service, to tackle some of the largest challenges facing our nation’s public benefit system—this is public service. If you’re like me, it recharges your battery and inspires you to keep doing this work.

Related

Blog Posts

A Persistent Challenge: How Financial Shocks Continue to Undermine Family Financial Security

Most households experience at least one financial shock in a given year, but there are few comprehensive solutions to help them. How can we solve this persistent challenge?

UnfavoriteFavoriteOctober 30, 2025

• Sheida Isabel Elmi

Blog Posts

Beyond Income: Worker Financial Security and the Role of Benefits Inside and Outside of the Workplace

U.S. workers need access to both public and workplace benefits, but often the connections between these benefits are fractured.

UnfavoriteFavoriteOctober 9, 2025

• Sheida Isabel Elmi

Blog Posts Videos

Video: We Don’t Have to Choose Between Financial Stability and Wealth

Households need tools that help them afford everyday life and build long-term security. Too often, policy systems fail to respond to both of these needs and instead prioritize one goal over the other.

UnfavoriteFavoriteSeptember 30, 2025

• Tim Shaw

Blog Posts

Designing for People, with People: Julia Dale on Creating Benefits Systems that Work

UnfavoriteFavoriteAugust 16, 2025

Publications

Unlocking Access: Mitigating Benefits Loss to Improve Cash Transfer Programs for SSI Recipients

UnfavoriteFavoriteJuly 29, 2025

• Sheida Isabel Elmi

Blog Posts

Freedom’s Unfinished Work: This Independence Day, Let’s Commit To Ending Working Poverty

UnfavoriteFavoriteJuly 1, 2025

• Maureen Conway

Blog Posts

How Work and Savings Penalties Block Financial Security and Economic Mobility

Work and savings penalties prevent the economic mobility of millions of workers. Learn more about how employers are working to address these barriers.

UnfavoriteFavoriteJune 17, 2025

• Bianca Sofia Lopez

Publications

Learning from Young Adults to Improve Public Benefits for All

Nearly one in five young adults experience poverty. Public benefits can help them afford daily life as they establish themselves.

UnfavoriteFavoriteMay 13, 2025

• Bianca Sofia Lopez
• Sheida Isabel Elmi

Blog Posts

How the National Strategy for Financial Inclusion Can Scale Emergency Savings

The U.S. Treasury’s Strategy notes the need for greater coordination among the private sector and the government to scale emergency savings.

UnfavoriteFavoriteMay 5, 2025

• Jason Ewas

Blog Posts

How the National Strategy for Financial Inclusion Can Improve Public Benefit Delivery

The Strategy outlines opportunities to improve benefits delivery, particularly through government provided or purchased financial products and services.

UnfavoriteFavoriteFebruary 3, 2025

• Alex Coccia

The post Leading with Empathy: Strengthening Benefits Delivery with Mike Wilkening appeared first on Aspen Institute.

The post In Session: Yuliya Tychkivska appeared first on Aspen Institute.

The post In Session: John Renehan appeared first on Aspen Institute.

The post In Session: Sonia Kapadia appeared first on Aspen Institute.